Government Agencies that are Changing the World: Corporate Strategies for Environmental Security
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2026-1-67-86Keywords:
public administration, environmental security, corporate strategy, sustainable development, ESG, environmental governance, green innovation, regulatory instruments, corporate environmental responsibility, ecological transformationAbstract
The article examines the role of public administration in shaping corporate environmental security strategies under conditions of global environmental transformation. The study proceeds from the assumption that environmental security should be understood not only as an object of state regulation or corporate compliance, but as a systemic sphere of interaction among public institutions, business, financial actors, and society. The purpose of the article is to develop an integrated understanding of how public administration influences the formation and implementation of corporate environmental security strategies through regulatory, economic, and motivational instruments. The research is based on a qualitative and analytical methodology that combines literature review, problem-oriented analysis, comparative assessment of international practices, and conceptual synthesis. The study identifies the key barriers that hinder the ecological transformation of business, including weak alignment between state environmental priorities and corporate strategies, insufficient incentives for green innovation, fragmented regulation, limited access to green financing, and disparities in environmental standards across countries. It is substantiated that the most effective environmental governance systems are those that combine legal requirements, financial support, and reputational incentives within a coherent institutional framework. The comparative analysis shows that the European Union represents a regulator-oriented model, the United States reflects a market-oriented model, and selected Asian countries demonstrate hybrid approaches to environmental governance. The article concludes that public administration plays a decisive role in creating the institutional conditions under which environmental priorities become strategically relevant for business. It is argued that public administration and corporate environmental security strategies should be interpreted as elements of a single environmental transformation mechanism. The practical significance of the study lies in substantiating the need for integrated governance approaches, especially for countries undergoing structural transformation and post-crisis recovery.
Downloads
References
Bodelan, V. R. (2013). Orhanizatsiino-funktsionalni struktury: osoblyvosti vplyvu chynnykiv yikh pobudovy na efektyvnist funktsionuvannia orhanizatsiinoho mekhanizmu derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Organizational and functional structures: Features of the influence of factors of their construction on the efficiency of the organizational mechanism of public administration]. Publichne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka, (3), 53-59. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pubupr_2013_3_10
Dielini, M. M. (2026). Mizhnarodni finansovi prohramy yak instrument vidnovlennia miskoi infrastruktury Ukrainy [International financial programs as a tool for the recovery of Ukraine’s urban infrastructure]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok, (3). https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156.2026.3.3
Dukov, D. F. (2016). Struktura mekhanizmiv derzhavnoho upravlinnia ta metodychnyi pidkhid do yii formuvannia [Structure of public administration mechanisms and a methodological approach to its formation]. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1/2(46/47), Part 1, 229-236. https://epa.nltu.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/445/439
Maliuska, V. A. (2010). Tsinnisni aspekty derzhavnoho upravlinnia v Ukraini [Value-based aspects of public administration in Ukraine]. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Derzhavne upravlinnia, (4), 17-20. https://pa.stateandregions.zp.ua/archive/4_2010/4.pdf
Myrna, N. V. (2010). Opratsiuvannia kompleksnoho mekhanizmu derzhavnoi rehionalnoi polityky [Elaboration of a comprehensive mechanism of state regional policy]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo, (1). URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/DeBu_2010_1_20.pdf
Pillai, R., Islam, M. A., Sreejith, S., & Al-Malkawi, H. A. A. (2025). Comparative analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings: Do sectors and regions differ? Journal of Management and Governance, 29(1), 69-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-023-09692-7
Tarasenko, D. L. (2026). Finansovo-investytsiini mekhanizmy publichnoho upravlinnia pisliavoiennoiu modernizatsiieiu systemy okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy (za otsinkamy RDNA5) [Financial and investment mechanisms of public administration for the post-war modernization of Ukraine’s healthcare system (based on RDNA5 assessments)]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok, (3). https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156.2026.3.2
Yoshida, K., Xie, J., Managi, S., & Yamadera, S. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance performance and financial impacts: Comparative analysis of companies in Asia (ADB Economics Working Paper No. 741). Asian Development Bank. https://asianbondsonline.adb.org/documents/ewp-741-esg-performance-financial-impacts.pdf
Zhyvko, Z. B., Orlova-Kurilova, O. V., Kredisov, V. A., & Taran-Lala, O. M. (2021). Modelling adaptive and simultaneous state-business partnership strategies in the context of conflict management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, digitalization and sustainable development. Economic Journal Odessa Polytechnic University, 3(17), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.15276/EJ.03.2021.6
Zhyvko, Z. B., & Stadnyk, M. Ye. (2021). Rol pidpryiemstv u zmitsnenni prisnovodnoi ta ekolohichnoi bezpeky [The role of enterprises in strengthening freshwater and environmental security]. Vcheni zapysky Universytetu “KROK”, 4(64), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2021-64-164-172
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.